3 Principles of The Canberra Spatial Plan
The key principles underpinning the Spatial Plan are:
- Containing growth
- Residential intensification
- Centralising new residential areas
- Locating employment
- Protecting biodiversity
- Good travel connections
- Sustainable growth of the region
The rationale behind these principles is outlined in this section.
Containing growth
The Canberra Spatial Plan provides an urban settlement strategy that
contains up to 50 per cent of the projected urban growth in the ACT and
surrounding NSW within the existing urban area of Canberra. In addition,
the Strategic Direction aims to contain up to 90 per cent of future urban
development projected to occur in the 30 year time frame of the Spatial
Plan to areas no further from Civic than the suburbs of Gungahlin (approximately
15 km).
The containment of the city within a 15 kilometre radius of the city
centre reflects the aspirations of our community to restrain urban expansion.
Containment will assist in maintaining a more sustainable city form in
terms of the following:
- Limiting travel time and distance — by minimising journey length
between home, employment, education, retail centres, recreation and
services. The alternative (as outlined in The
ACT and Sub-Region Planning Strategy 1998) proposes future urban growth in the locality of Gooromon–Jeir
to the north west of the ACT. Gooromon–Jeir was originally identified
as a future urban area in the Y-Plan of 1967. The Y-Plan was based
on significant levels of containment of trips within distinct urban
areas (the districts around each town centre). Despite 30 years of
planning, these levels of containment have not been achieved — for
example, Tuggeranong (which is approaching completion) contains 25
per cent of the residential population of Canberra, but only 9 per
cent of the employment, meaning that most of the people living in Tuggeranong
must travel elsewhere for jobs. Similarly, whilst education institutions
in the Government system and food based retailing are well distributed
in each district so trips to these are largely contained, tertiary
education is centralised in the city centre and Belconnen, and 30 per
cent of retail floor space (the vast majority of the bulky goods retailing
for the ACT) is located in Fyshwick. Further dispersement of the urban
development to areas like Gooromon–Jeir is not likely to achieve
any higher levels of containment (indeed, the trend is towards lesser
containment as trips become more complex). Thus, by ensuring that new
residential development occurs either within the existing urban area,
or close to existing development, trip lengths are minimised.
- Accessibility — Canberrans value the high levels of accessibility offered
by the well planned layout of the city and its roads. Public transport
access, particularly to the areas most distant from employment, is good
by Australian city standards, but the time taken from origin to destination
means that people relying on public transport do not have high levels
of access. By containing the extent of future urban development to no
further than 15 kilometres from the city centre, the high levels of accessibility
the city currently offers will be retained and enhanced as more people
are able to live close to centres of employment and services. A city
structure that offers centralised employment, by district and in the
central area, with retail and other services provided at the district
level, optimises the operation of a public transport system while at
the same time allowing for a distribution of private vehicle traffic
that avoids congestion of trunk routes (as would be the case if Gooromon–Jeir
was to be the next major area of development).
- Increasing the vibrancy of the city centre — containing growth
within a distance that allows easy access to the city centre, and encouraging
significant additional residential development in and around the city
centre will increase the vibrancy of that centre by creating 24 hour
activity.
- Biodiversity conservation and environmental
protection — containing
outward spread of the city so that the ‘footprint’ of the
city on the landscape is minimised (whilst balancing it with the need
to provide housing choice) assists greatly in protecting biodiversity.
Containing urban development also minimises the impacts of urban growth
on the environment by reducing the per capita production of greenhouse
gases and consumption of energy.
|